首页> 外文OA文献 >Tinjauan Yuridis Peninjauan Kembali Lebih dari Sekali Dikaitkan dengan Upaya Perlindungan terhadap Hak Terpidana Berdasarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pengajuan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perkara Pidana
【2h】

Tinjauan Yuridis Peninjauan Kembali Lebih dari Sekali Dikaitkan dengan Upaya Perlindungan terhadap Hak Terpidana Berdasarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pengajuan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perkara Pidana

机译:司法复审不止一次与基于保护最高人民法院关于复审刑事案件复审请求的第2014年第7号通函的保护刑事权利的努力联系在一起

摘要

Reconsideration is a remedy that can be taken by the convict in a case of law against a decision of a court that has permanent legal force in the judicial system in Indonesia . Reconsideration categorized as an extraordinary legal remedy because it has the privilege, meaning that it can be used to reopen a court decision which has had permanent legal force. Thus the institution Reconsideration is a remedy that is used to retract or reject the judge\u27s decision has had permanent legal force. Mary Jane Veloso a drug kingpin arrested for carrying 2.6 kg of heroin in Yogyakarta, on March 25, 2015 Mary Jane file a judicial review through the Sleman District Court but was rejected. However, the Review that Mary Jane make a schedule execution pending death. Then, Mary Jane file a Reconsideration second, but immediately rejected. The reason for rejection of the Supreme Court because it does not find new Novum.This type of research is classified in normative law research using the method of assessment literature or documentary study, the author quotes from books, literature, or book support, which has links with the problems to be studied. The data used primary legal materials, secondary law and tertiary legal materials.From the research problem there are five things that can be inferred. First, provisions prohibiting judicial review more than once not only found in the Code of Criminal Procedure but also in other regulations such as the Law on Judicial Power and the Law on the Supreme Court. second, a growing number of reconsideration is granted by the Supreme court, indicates that the court decision a lot wrong, make mistakes and wrong. Third, for reasons of legal certainty and justice. Fourth, the absence of restrictions on the filing of a judicial review will have implications for the possibility of flooding case reconsideration . Fifth, Novum Ideal requirements that can be submitted as evidence in a judicial review more than once that the new witnesses, new information, new evidence, a major role of judges, and should be tolled in the legislation.Suggestions author, the terms of the petition filing Reconsideration should be clarified, so as not to cause more mistakes than those who want to apply for a judicial review and determine the qualifications Novum described in detail with examples Novum-novum or new circumstances in the verdict Reconsideration ,
机译:重审是一种补救措施,在涉及印度尼西亚司法系统中具有永久法律效力的法院判决的法律案件中,罪犯可以采取这种补救措施。重审被归类为一种特殊的法律补救措施,因为它具有特权,这意味着它可以用于重新启动具有永久法律效力的法院判决。因此,机构复议是一种补救措施,用于撤回或拒绝法官的裁决具有永久法律效力。玛丽·简·韦洛索(Mary Jane Veloso)是一名毒品大佬,他因在日惹携带2.6千克海洛因而被捕。2015年3月25日,玛丽·简·韦洛索通过Sleman地区法院提交了司法复审,但遭到拒绝。但是,玛丽·简(Mary Jane)即将死刑的时间表得以执行。然后,玛丽·简(Mary Jane)第二次提出重新审议,但立即被拒绝。之所以拒绝最高法院的原因是因为它没有找到新的Novum。这类研究在规范法研究中使用评估文学或文献研究的方法进行分类,作者引用了书籍,文献或书籍的支持,其中包括与要研究的问题联系在一起。这些数据使用了主要法律材料,次要法律和第三法律材料。从研究问题上可以推断出五件事。首先,不仅在《刑事诉讼法》中而且在其他法规(例如《司法权法》和《最高法院法》)中都发现了禁止司法复核的规定。其次,最高法院批准了越来越多的重新考虑,这表明法院的判决有很多错误,犯错也有错。第三,出于法律确定性和正义的原因。第四,对司法复审的限制没有限制,这可能导致重新审理案件的可能性。第五,Novum理想的要求,可以在司法审查中作为证据多次提交,即新证人,新信息,新证据,法官的主要作用,并应在立法中予以规定。请澄清申请复议,以免引起比那些想申请司法审查并确定Novum资格的人更多的错误,并在判决Reconsideration中详细描述示例Novum-novum或新情况,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号